“Lonely Mime”: Mikhail Khokhlachev (AKA Michael Cheval)
After the “ kwassa- kwassa” in Mayotte, the air conditioners in Burkina Faso , the fertility of African women at the 2017 G20 summit, Emmanuel 1st , King of France and Navarre, continues his work of enriching the large register of royal blunders Macronian. This time, it’s s attacker free and wickedly Algeria that it still considers its former colony. And there was no dead hand, far from it. With his fleur-de-lis scepter, he spared neither his government nor his history: when you can do several stupid things, why settle for just one?
Yet had he not recommended ” turning the page” during his last trip to Algeria? Or is the page turner part of the regalia of the French crown, thus obeying only the moods and whims of the monarch?
Of course, the reaction of Algerian citizens to his bellicose declarations was not long in coming. The blogosphere ignited, triggering a rich anthology of jeers and hawks that lit the cyberspace sky. Even a subsequent attempt to soften his words did nothing, quite the contrary.
What to do then if not to give the order to his army of royal buffoons to intervene, these “ ethnic alibis” so well maintained in times of peace and so precious in these moments of turbulence?
It should be noted that the mandate assigned to these devoted collaborators is to minimize or even ignore the verbal attacks of Emmanuel 1 st and to attack, without qualms, the Algerian authorities, Algeria and to all those who defend the dignity of their country and its sovereignty.
From this taxonomic species of “native informants”, so prolific in our latitude, we will choose a few representative specimens.
Ferhat The 1st
The first to react, like a frog with an electrical stimulus is Ferhat 1 st , Sultan proclaimed the fictional kingdom of Kabylie and vassal of the French king. It is true that the declaration of his suzerain on the “creation” of Algeria rang in the ears of the founder of the MAK (Movement for the self-determination of Kabylia) like a sweet melody. Would Emmanuel 1st have willingly and knowingly offered “blessed bread” to Ferhat 1st to comfort him in his secessionist fantasies? Are not offering shelter, protection and even speech the attributes of a suzerain to his vassal? Especially if it could anger the Algerian government.
Ali dilem
Here is a typical example of role reversal so well illustrated, all shame drunk, by the cartoonist of the newspaper Liberté . Note in passing that this designer has shown unparalleled zeal in defending Ferhat 1 st and his movement.
While provocation and aggression are the deliberate and unilateral works of the French sovereign, the Algerian is represented there as a savage head-cutter, rushing drum beating on everything French. This dishonest portrayal of reality deserved proper correction. What was done:
Let’s not forget that Dilem has been decorated twice by France. In 2010, he received the insignia of Chevalier des Arts et Lettres and, in 2017, he was promoted to the rank of Officer of Arts and Letters by the Presidency of the French Republic.
Would that be enough to explain the role reversal in the caricature?
Kamel Daoud
The editorial line of the newspaper Liberté raises serious questions about its relationship with France. Indeed, in addition to Dilem, the daily hosted the rantings of the author Kamel Daoud on the same subject and with the same orientation.
The flogging of Algerian citizens is a “literary technique” of which Kamel Daoud has become the greatest specialist (read my book on this subject ) and this article is no exception. There he used his prose whip to whip those who had “the arrogance” to criticize the words of the King of France and Navarre.
Faithful to his role of neocolonized writer that I described in one of my books (aggravating factor: he has since been naturalized French ), he exceeded the mystification of the cartoonist by several lengths in an article entitled “ To feel humiliated after the declarations by Macron ”.
Judge:
“ After Macron’s statements on Algeria, memory and the future, I felt personally humiliated. What he said? No. What humiliates is the empty, futile extent of the reaction of mine, of Algerians. So much rage, anger and exaggerations humiliate in that they reveal the void of a national, Algerian, collective project for this country ”.
The former journalist of the Quotidien d’Oran cannot feel humiliated by the words of Emmanuel 1st : he cannot afford it. Isn’t he the one who is “admired” by the tenant of the Élysée? Wasn’t it he who was one of the few to be invited to the table of the French monarch at the French Embassy during his visit in 2017?
Let us note, in passing, a flagrant similarity between the caricature of Dilem and the words of Kamel Daoud: the Algerian citizen is represented with “rage” and “anger”. He is the “barbarian” who, with an ax, attacks the “civilized” of France.
Was that enough? Nay! A few additional lashes were not too much, just to be admired a little more by the French monarchy to which he feels so close:
“ The hatred of France, we have it, and it is a truth. But it is not due solely to the murders of the past. It is due to emptiness, to the present, to idleness, it is shared between the victim’s rentiers and preachers of new crusades, between unemployed Islamists and de-colonialists, it binds us together and traps us, prevents us from sleeping and waking up. , to work and to have a dream other than that of destroying France or going to live there. It is a reality ”.
Where are you Great Emir Abdelkader to teach us again to unconditionally cherish our country and to love our fellow citizens? Where are you to remind us that the earth that we have under our feet, we must defend it against the neocolonizers with our hands, our soul and our heart?
Lahouari Addi
The official sociologist of the NED (National Endowment for Democracy) was entitled, for his part, to the red carpet of the newspaper Le Monde . Whoever wants to enter the “temple” of French journalism. We don’t mess around with titles, do we?
In an article he entitled “On Algeria, Emmanuel Macron said publicly what his predecessors said in private“, Lahouari Addi took advantage of the hospitality of this newspaper known for its “unconditional love” of Algeria to open hostilities on all Algerian state institutions. By cons, he treated the words of Emmanuel 1st“courageous, overcoming the reason of state and not shrinking economic sector lobbies.” The King of France and Navarre portrayed in his valiant knight’s habit, without fear and without reproach!
Ah, the galloping imagination and romanticism of the sociologists of the French court! The great lord to the north of the Mediterranean and the wicked beggars to his south! The “Daoudian” neocolonization which is emulated!
In his analysis of Macronian statements, Lahouari Addi did not hesitate to detect a link with the Hirak. Of course, he was not going to miss the opportunity, he, one of the self-proclaimed tenors of Hirak ! For that, one must have the competence of a “professor emeritus” in order to read between the lines and find there what did not even occur to the mind of the author himself.
” By the remarks he made on September 30, Emmanuel Macron explicitly recognizes the political legitimacy of the Hirak’s demands, which is unacceptable for the Algerian regime which, until now, has always benefited from the diplomatic support of the France ”.
Obviously, he did not miss the opportunity to place the slogan “ Dawla madania machi askaria ” (Civil and non-military status) dear to offshore Islamawists and followers of the “adulterated Hirak”, in complete opposition to the motto of the original Hirak. ” Djeich, chaâb, khawa khawa ” (Army, people, brother, brother) “.
Radio M
We are not going to end this “collection” without quoting Radio M , the one which calls itself “the Little Radio of the Grand Maghreb” but which is in fact only the “ Radio Barbouze du Quai d’Orsay”. Moreover, this qualifier will be confirmed in what follows.
First, it acted as an echo chamber for Lahouari Addi’s statement about Hirak in his Le Monde article and made it nothing less than the title of one of his editorials.
Furthermore, in response to the controversy generated in Algeria by the hostile statements of Emmanuel 1 st , Le Monde published an article in which he reported that ” the words of French President questioning the existence of the” nation Algerian “have held up even the fiercest opponents of the Algerian regime “.
After listing the many criticisms, the journalist specified that “ one of the few, if not the only, positive stance towards the French president came from political scientist Mohammed Hennad […] in an interview with Radio M […] ”.
Radio M favorable to the French monarch? This is probably only a mild understatement if we trust the title given to this intervention by political scientist Mohammed Hennad:
And, regarding the reduction in the number of visas for Algerians, Radio M behaved like the spokesperson for Gérald Darmanin, French Minister of the Interior:
Emmanuel 1 st can be proud of his legion of fools. With so many docile Indigenous informants and staunch Indigenous advocates, he has an effective disinformation machine.
But the King of France and Navarre certainly has no idea of the army of Algerian patriots, jealous of the sovereignty of their country.
And these, unlike his buffoons, have a deep aversion to any foreign interference in the affairs of their country. Especially when it comes to interference from a country that has mistreated them for 132 years.
